Fact or Fiction?


I don’t think that the real question here is whether or not Mike Daisey is a liar, but whether or not his intentions were unethical. It is absolutely clear that Daisey fabricated many of the details of his story and there is no doubting that he did in fact lie to the public about what he encountered at the Foxconn factory. And while many of us want to be angry at him and believe that his fabricated story is unethical, I think it’s important to first think about what his intentions were in creating this monologue in the first place.


This story was created for theatrical purposes, not to be used as a piece of journalism. I don’t think that it was unethical of him to make this story in the first place, but I do believe that Daisey made a huge mistake in confirming that it was journalistically accurate and allowing it to be broadcasted on TAL. Daisey’s intention was to create a dramatic story about Apple factory workers in China that would elicit an emotional response from his audience. I don’t see anything wrong with this, but Daisey should have been more upfront and honest about what parts of his monologue actually represented the truth. 


Even though Daisey claims that he regrets ever letting TAL air his monologue, part of me thinks that this may not be completely true either. I think that airing the story allowed Daisey to achieve what he wanted, which was to spark widespread controversy and concern about the working conditions in Chinese factories. He wanted to elicit and emotional response and make people care, even if that meant lying about what he experienced. This brings to light the fact that you can’t believe everything the media tells us, because if someone wants you to think a certain way they may say whatever they need to in order achieve this, whether it’s fact or fiction.


2 thoughts on “Fact or Fiction?

  1. I agree that media can manipulate people to believe certain pieces of information or opinions, like Mike Daisey did with his podcast. But that makes me wonder if there is any media source that we can trust to provide unbiased, truthful information. It seems like informants that lie, like Daisey, cause suspicion and mistrust among all people looking for true information. Although his intentions with publishing the story may have been ethical, the result is propagating lies and sensationalism in media.

  2. Your response is in many ways similar to mine, as you indicated in your response on my blog. Do you think that when his theatrical story caught public media he expected the story to become so widely spread and thus ignored how unethical it would be to claim it was a journalistic peace?

What do YOU think? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s