Paper 2 and haiku (blog 8) / Uncategorized

What leads to happiness?


Why did we do this?

It was fun for a while

And boom went Lehman

The events on Wall Street the weekend of September 13 and 14, 2008 were described as “the most extraordinary events I’ve ever seen” by Peter Peterson, co-founder of the Blackstone Group (NYT Article). Within a number of days, Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America, insurance company AIG was bailed out by the government, and Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Weeks before the government bailed out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they also helped construct the deal helping JP Morgan acquire Bear Stearns.

lehman-brothers-sign-007

After exploring Enron’s collapse and eventually bankruptcy in Paper 1, I decided to stay on topic and analyze a second, more recent bankruptcy in Lehman Brothers. I hope to maybe somehow find a link between the two to help support my White Paper, but that remains to be seen. What I plan to research in Paper 2 are decisions Lehman Brothers made leading up to and during the subprime mortgage crisis that lead to their collapse. I believe the ethical theory of utilitarianism is apparent in Wall Street leading up to the Great Recession. These big banks including Lehman were making decisions to maximize their utility, or happiness; and to do that they wanted to bolster their bottom line. What these banks failed to realize before it was too late was that this wasn’t sustainable, ethical, or smart.

There are many questions that I hope to answer regarding the Great Recession, including: Did everyone involved know they were contributing to the mortgage crisis as a whole? Did the culture of Wall Street foster a certain ethical ideology that contributed to the crisis? And how could these big banks, especially Lehman Brothers been more socially responsible to avoid and survive the crisis?

Articles:

Lehman Bankruptcy – NYT

Lehman Bankruptcy – WSJ

Photo

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “What leads to happiness?

  1. I think this can be a great topic. I would say that happiness is too broad maybe. I think the financial gains of parties involved and stakeholders is where you may want to focus. Then of course does money lead to happiness… 🙂

  2. Good poem!

    One aspect of utilitarianism that is interesting is how do we decide “who is affected.” A problem for Lehman and the subprime mortgage crisis was systemic risk- risk form over-connection or interdependence.

    Also, the best use of utilitarianism is usually if we can isolate choice A or choice B. So, in the larger story, can you identify that kind of choice for Lehman?

What do YOU think? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s